LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Case sends warning to wind farm developers 

Credit:  www.mudgeeguardian.com.au 18 November 2011 ~~

A Supreme Court decision in South Australia should send a warning to wind farm developers that they need to consult with the community, Member for Orange Andrew Gee said this week.

The third stage of AGL’s Hallet wind farm was challenged by a resident who claimed that it was depriving residents within a 3.5 km radius of sleep.

The Full Court of the South Australian Supreme Court allowed the appeal after AGL admitted it had found some of the turbines from the first two stages were emitting an audible noise that breach government guidelines.

AGL had been shutting down 16 of their 34 turbines at night.

Mr Gee said he was concerned to hear that throughout Australia, more than 20 families had left their homes because of the effects of wind turbine noise on their health.

“Currently in the Orange electorate there are plans for a number of wind turbine farms that are far bigger than the one at Hallett in South Australia,” he said.

Mr Gee said one of the results of the Hallet case was that people who had previously been vilified and labelled as serial complainers were now being taken seriously by their operators.

He said he would be urging the NSW Government to take careful note of the South Australian Supreme Court decision in drafting guidelines for wind farms.

Mr Gee said he would also recommend that any company planning to operate a wind farm takes heed of the case and consults not only with owners of land where they plan to locate turbines, but also property owners who are not being asked to host turbines.

“This court decision showed state planning authorities need to pay close attention to the location of wind farms near houses,” he said.

“The South Australian case questioned whether the turbines were compliant with that state’s noise guidelines and it turned out that they weren’t.”

Source:  www.mudgeeguardian.com.au 18 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky