LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Planning for our ridgelines is needed 

Credit:  Lloyd Crawford, Hawley ~~

As I read week after week about the continuing debates about cell tower proposals, I can’t help but feel that local communities have their “heads in the sand” when it comes to a much larger future impact to our ridgelines, wind turbines. Few people seem to understand that where proposed cell towers would reach 40 to 60 feet above the trees, modern wind turbines are 350 to as much as 500 tall. Significant land clearing is required for each turbine and permanent access roads capable of handling 100 ton loads and tractor trailers up to 135’ long must be built to accommodate their construction and maintenance. Whereas, relatively small numbers of additional cell towers are likely to be proposed locally, hundreds of turbines must be constructed in order for Massachusetts to achieve its stated goals for producing renewable energy. There is pressure to build wind farms in West County, in particular. The majority of the state’s wind resources exist in the offshore waters where there are plenty of wealthy beachfront homeowners to fight them. The next windiest places are the highest ridges of Berkshire County where there are also plenty of potential opponents and legitimate environmental issues. That leaves the high ridges around here as the most likely places where wind farms will be constructed.

Regardless of how people may feel about the role of wind power vs. conventional sources in satisfying our future energy needs, I do feel that most people would agree that reasonable controls over siting these projects are required. After all, virtually all communities regulate commercial/industrial development to minimize impacts such as noise, bright lights, compatibility with existing land uses etc. Why should wind power developments not be required to adhere to similar standards? Local bylaws are needed. The time to develop them is now. We, in Hawley, have developed a bylaw that will come before the community for a public hearing July 20. Is your planning board considering this issue?

Lloyd Crawford
Hawley

Source:  Lloyd Crawford, Hawley

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky