LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lubenham wind mast wins approval 

A mast to measure wind speed has been given the go-ahead by planners despite more than 510 letters of objection.

The application to put up a 50-metre anemometer between Gartree and Lubenham for a year was given the green light by Harborough District Council’s planning committee yesterday night (Tuesday, July 22)

Energy4All’s proposal for the mast has proved controversial because opponents believe it will lead to a wind farm on the farmland.

The energy company has said it wants to place four 125-metre high wind turbines on the land and the mast will test whether it is a suitable location.

Speaking at the meeting, the chairman of Lubenham Parish Council Diana Cook said she was speaking on behalf a large number of objectors.

“It’s hard for us to separate this from what we may expect to follow-on afterwards,” she said.

Energy4All’s development manager John Malone said: “Wind speeds and direction are essential for testing a site for its suitability.”

Supporter Sarah Clarke told councillors she was in favour of sustainable energy and added: “I walk there often. I think that visibility (of the mast] is not going to be a problem.”

Councillors said they had to look at this application on its merits and not what it might eventually lead to.

Cllr Eileen Roeber said: “It’s a measuring instrument and no more. It’s not a wind farm, It’s a scope. It could be that the evidence will show it isn’t an appropriate location.”

Cllr Janette Ackerley added: “There are no planning reasons to refuse this.”

The mast was approved unanimously.

By Alex Blackwell

Lutterworth Mail

23 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon