LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Armow wind project doubles 

Armow-area resident Scott Duncan, a community representative on the Inter-Municipal Wind Turbine Working Group, said they feel "betrayed and exploited" by the changes that are coming, after what they felt was progress made with representatives of Acciona. Duncan said they had concerns about the potential of "in-filling" within the project if Acciona followed through with the project. Aside from the health effects thought linked to wind turbines, his neighbours are also fearful of the drastic change in landscape, the impact on property values and real estate in their area, and a lack of say for their Amish neighbours, who represent 25% of the project area, he said.

Credit:  By Troy Patterson, The Sun Times, www.markdalestandard.com ~~

The Samsung-Pattern Armow Wind Power Project is doubling in size and even more in capacity after the joint project was re-evaluated after it was purchased from Acciona in September.

Samsung Renewable Energy Inc. and Pattern Energy Group LP jointly purchased the original 54-turbine, 80MW project from Acciona and now plan to have a maximum of 99 turbines rated for a total of 198MW, but the developers expect it may end up being 92 turbines at 184MW, since some sites might be disqualified.

“During the permitting process we may lose a few,” said Colin Edwards, senior developer for Pattern in Canada, adding they weren’t sure why Acciona didn’t make its project more dense in its project area.

“We took the same land fabric and identified a large number of sites we could build on that would still be compliant with noise regulations.”

The turbines selected will be the Siemens 2.3MW model, which will be “derated” to 2MW in order to meet noise requirements. Edwards said the models are “very common” in the Chatham-Kent area and will also be used for the next phase of the Kingsbridge wind project near Goderich, where Samsung-Pattern is building another 140 turbines.

Edwards said the project will include a large area in Kincardine, stretching north in Bruce Township to Bruce Rd. 20, east to Bruce Rd. 1, South to Hwy. 9 and west to Sideroad J/I, or King St. in Tiverton.

Staff are conducting archaeological tests at a number of sites in the region, but are hoping for final Ontario Power Authority approvals by June 2012, with construction expected to begin in late 2012 or early 2013.

“A number of communities have passed setback guidelines that would preclude any turbine development by agenda-oriented councils,” he said. “We’re happy to comply with many of these guidelines and look forward to working with municipalities in these sensitive areas.”

Edwards said neither the compensation for landowners, nor the “vibrancy fund” they are planning as health and education-related community donations, have been ironed out. He did confirm that the company will contribute a sum larger than the current $50,000 Enbridge Community Fund.

“It’s not just going to be landowners that benefit,” said Edwards. “As a whole, the community sees them and should also benefit.”

Edwards said the companies have yet to be in contact with the Inter-Municipal Wind Turbine Working Group or the Armow Citizens Group, which have opposed the siting and density of the project, or receive support from Kincardine council.

“We’ve not engaged with them officially yet, but we have met with some elected officials,” Edwards said.

Armow-area resident Scott Duncan, a community representative on the Inter-Municipal Wind Turbine Working Group, said they feel “betrayed and exploited” by the changes that are coming, after what they felt was progress made with representatives of Acciona.

Duncan said they had concerns about the potential of “in-filling” within the project if Acciona followed through with the project. Aside from the health effects thought linked to wind turbines, his neighbours are also fearful of the drastic change in landscape, the impact on property values and real estate in their area, and a lack of say for their Amish neighbours, who represent 25% of the project area, he said.

“There’s been little information shared by Samsung since they took over the project,” said Duncan. “There’s a lot of people out there that are shocked and outraged that the project is going to be even bigger. This is one of the things we feared all along.”

Since the public now knows of Samsung’s energy deal with the province, Duncan said the feeling in the area is the deal is already done before dialogue has even begun with the new company.

“We had little hope with Acciona, but more hope that they would work with local residents to balance the scale,” he said. “We are dismayed at the greed that has divided this previously tight-knit community from a minority of landowners that will see the benefits from this.”

The most shocking factor, Duncan said, is the size and scale of the new Siemens model of turbine, which he said will be significantly larger than either model of turbine in the Enbridge or Ripley wind projects, and will be visible from even farther away.

“The landscape is going to be drastically changed in a radius unprecedented up until this point,” said Duncan. “Nobody here has the experience to understand what we’re in for.”

Samsung-Pattern is planning an open house sometime in the next two months and Edwards said it would be advertised locally in the media.

Those who have questions or concerns about the project can call 519-672-3006.

Source:  By Troy Patterson, The Sun Times, www.markdalestandard.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon