LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Kirkharle windfarm plan on MP’s land is rejected 

Credit:  by Paul Tully, The Journal, www.journallive.co.uk 8 November 2011 ~~

Controversial plans for a wind farm on land in Northumberland owned by a southern-based Tory MP have been thrown out.

Four 125-metre turbines proposed for Kirkharle in mid-Northumberland raised a storm of protest – and accusations of hypocrisy against landowner and former Northumberland county councillor Neil Carmichael, now an MP in Stroud, Gloucestershire, who has opposed a similar application in his constituency.

But Government Appeals Inspector David Rose has now come down against the plans from RWE npower Renewables.

Mr Rose says the damage to the heritage and picturesque landscape of the village of Great Bavington would be unacceptable.

Last night Bavington Parish Council chairman Peter Ramsden greeted the news with delight.

“We are very pleased with the outcome and it is a big relief for the local people,” he said. “I don’t think anybody could criticise what is a balanced and fair judgment by the inspector.

“Some of the objections were very difficult to dispute and this judgment reaffirms the planning process and reassures us that it is not a free-for-all for wind farms in Northumberland.”

Original 2008 proposals for eight turbines were pared down to four on land east of Bavington Hill Head Farm and west of Northside Farm.

But Northumberland County Council turned down the application last year.

RWE npower appealed on the basis that the authority had not affirmed its decision within the statutory 16 weeks.

However, the county council claimed npower’s environmental statement was “seriously deficient” and had not addressed the request for further information made by the former Tynedale Council in March 2009.

The company argued Northumberland had to meet increasing Government green-energy targets by 2020 but while Mr Rose conceded there would be “a very significant challenge” in meeting those targets, he said the harm to the Kirkharle area would outweigh any advantages.

Other wind farm applications in the region added to the overall effect and Mr Rose said: “In my opinion, the aggregated harm to the landscape, the damage to the living conditions of one dwelling, and the significant negative impacts on the setting of designated heritage assets tip the balance against the project.”

The inspector added: “There remains the utmost urgency, nationally and locally in Northumberland, to tap the resource of wind where it can be harvested.”

But planning policy criteria on landscape, residential amenity and cultural heritage, he said, “would be breached in this case”.

The battle went to a two-week public inquiry at Hexham in August with objections from a number of bodies including Newcastle Airport, which voiced concern over possible radar interference from the turbines.

Northumberland County Council head of development services, Karen Ledger, last night said that the council welcomed the inspector’s decision to refuse planning permission.

Source:  by Paul Tully, The Journal, www.journallive.co.uk 8 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon