LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind power project applicant seeks reconsideration; Opponents, too 

Credit:  Sverre Bakke, The Enterprise, www.whitesalmonenterprise.com 1 November 2011 ~~

Five parties to the Whistling Ridge Energy Project’s site certification proceedings have filed petitions for reconsideration with the state agency that last month recommended the wind power project’s approval.

Applicant Whistling Ridge Energy Partners, LLC, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc., Save Our Scenic Area and Seattle Audubon Society separately, and Skamania County and the Klickitat County Public Economic Development Authority jointly, have asked the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council to reconsider its Oct. 6 recommendation. The council, during a special meeting in Stevenson, voted 6-0 to recommend approval of a 75-megawatt project with modifications and conditions.

The modifications included the elimination of three wind turbine strings – or 15 of 50 proposed turbines – from the project “to avoid impacts to the Columbia River Gorge,” the council said in an Oct. 7 news release.

According to the council, parties had 20 days following publication of the decision to file their requests for reconsideration. The parties now have until Nov. 14 to reply to each other.

“It’s hard to say how long the council will take to review the petitions and responses and announce a decision on reconsideration, but I suspect it will be at least three weeks, maybe longer,” said Nathan Baker, staff attorney for Friends of the Columbia Gorge.

The roughly $150 million Whistling Ridge Energy Project – a joint venture between SDS Lumber Co. and Broughton Lumber Co. – would be built out over 1,152 acres of private commercial timberland in southeastern Skamania County, to the west and northwest of Underwood. If licensed and built, Whistling Ridge would be the state’s first wind farm on commercial forest lands.

During seven public hearings held on the Whistling Ridge application, more than 200 citizens testified, according to the council. “The most contentious issue was the effect the wind turbines would have on the views in the Columbia Gorge,” the council’s Oct. 7 announcment stated.

As part of its decision to recommend site certification, the council axed the three turbine strings that would have been the most visible from Columbia Gorge viewing areas.

The Enterprise contacted Jason Spadaro, president of Whistling Ridge Energy, by e-mail Monday but did not receive any official statements prior to the publication deadline.

The petition filed by the Friends, said Baker, asks the council, among other issues, “to reconsider whether the project is consistent with local land use authorities, whether the applicant has completed the required wildlife surveys, and how to reduce and mitigate the scenic, traffic, noise and other impacts of the project.”

Baker said the reconsideration process allows the council to address issues that the parties care about before the recommendation package is forwarded to the governor. “We’re hopeful that the council will reconsider and revise its recommendation as a result of our petition,” he added.

Once she receives that package, Gov. Christine Gregoire will have 60 days to “approve the application and execute the agreement, reject the application, or ask the council to reconsider [its] recommendation,” the council stated on Oct. 7.

Next week The Enterprise will follow-up with a detailed review of each petition.

Source:  Sverre Bakke, The Enterprise, www.whitesalmonenterprise.com 1 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky