LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Another wind farm on the county’s horizon 

Credit:  By DAVID MARTIN, Regional Editor, The Green River Star, greenriverstar.com 19 October 2011 ~~

A new wind farm project is on the horizon and representatives of the company proposing the farm discussed their project with the Sweetwater County Commissioners yesterday afternoon.

The project is proposed by Enxco, a company with experience in developing 51 wind projects in 15 states. Its Quaking Aspen Wind Farm is proposed to be placed 11.5 miles south of Rock Springs near the south side of Aspen Mountain.

According to Nate Sandvig, site developer for Enxco, the project will involve 72 wind generators ranging from 1.6-1.8 megawatts apiece. The turbines would not be visible from either Rock Springs or the top of White Mountain.

The company has negotiated an interconnection agreement with Pacificorp to provide 150 megawatts while its notice of intent lists a maximum of 250 megawatts to accommodate for future wind turbine technology.

Sandvig said the project involves 3,397 acres of land belonging to the Bureau of Land Management, 610 acres of state lands and another 3,645 acres of land owned by private entities.

Lance Porter, field manager for the Bureau of Land Management’s Rock Springs Field Office, said the BLM expects to start its scoping process sometime in December, after the notice of intent is published in the Federal Register.

Porter, at the request of Commissioner Reid West, also gave a quick update of other wind projects.

The Teton Wind Project, which plans to put 240 wind generators on White Mountain, was asked to study and draft a plan protecting avian and bat populations found on the mountain. Porter said the study must have at least 12 months of data and said the company should be finished with their study in the spring of 2012.

The Sweeney Wind Project was recently placed on hold as the company behind the project is still negotiating power purchase agreements.

Commissioner Wally Johnson warned Sandvig and the other presenters about the controversy the wind farm proposal would generate amongst county residents. Johnson said while Carbon and Uinta Counties have wind projects, Sweetwater does not have one.

“It’s okay if the rest of the state laughs at Sweetwater County. We know what we have here … it’s a treasure,” West said.

Johnson continued by saying he supports the development of natural resources. However, when the resource is depleted, such as in the case of a coal mine or gas well, the area is reclaimed.

According to Johnson, once the reclamation is completed, no one would know what used to be at the site.

However, Johnson said wind will be around forever and said his main problem with wind farms is that the towers will be around forever as well.

Commissioner John Kolb asked about light pollution caused by aircraft avoidance lights on wind towers.

Sandvig said the Federal Aviation Administration has taken a number of measures to avoid the light pollution issue on newer wind farm projects.

Kolb also asked about the feasibility of wind as an energy source without federal subsidies, saying the industry needs to be taxed more than it already is.

Greg Probst, northwest region director for Enxco said wind energy competes well with natural gas energy. The natural gas market, according to Probst, typically revolves around peaks and valleys in the price of natural gas.

Probst admits that no renewable energy source can be competitive with low priced natural gas, however he also maintains that his company doesn’t pursue energy projects that wouldn’t be profitable. Probst said the company has historicly built and sold their wind projects to other companies, including Pacificorp and is one of the largest third-party providers of operations and maintenance to wind farms in the country.

Sara Flitner, a public relations expert working with the group, said she wants to hear feedback from all the local experts who have experience with the area and have concerns about the project.

With that input, Flitner believes Enxco will build the best wind project they possibly can.

Source:  By DAVID MARTIN, Regional Editor, The Green River Star, greenriverstar.com 19 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky