LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Offer would compensate landowners 

Details of any planned compensation for landowners whose property values may fall because of a proposal to establish a wind farm near Gore will remain secret after a ruling from the panel hearing the application.

TrustPower, which wants to build a large wind farm at Kaiwera Downs, southwest of Gore, had sent affected landowners a letter last December which responded to concerns about the negative impact the development would have on their property values.

That letter outlined a ‘‘framework’’ to provide compensation for any loss in value of land in the area.

But the power company asked the Gore District Council hearings panel to keep the letter’s details secret.

TrustPower’s counsel argued the panel should place an order prohibiting its publication and any other communications of its details.

Panel chairman David Pullar issued a temporary order to that effect and invited any submitter and TrustPower to debate whether that order should stay in place at the end of the hearing, which officially finished last Friday.

In its decision issued late last week, the panel said it was satisfied an order was necessary to ‘‘avoid unreasonable prejudice’’ to Trust-Power’s commercial position.

‘‘In the circumstances, the importance of avoiding prejudice outweighs the public interest in making that information available,’’ Mr Pullar said.

The panel also considered the letter was part of a confidential negotiation process and that confidentiality should be respected.

Its ruling means the contents of the letter cannot be published in any form.

Anyone breaching that decision would be committing an offence under the Resource Management Act and could be fined up to $10,000.

The panel’s decision can be appealed to the Environment Court.

By Glenn Conway

Otago Daily Times

22 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky