LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Public hearing on wind turbine bill 

Credit:  By: Brandon Walker, Your News Now, capitalregion.ynn.com 7 September 2011 ~~

HANCOCK, Mass. – The Wind Siting Reform Act would make the permitting process to build a wind turbine easier. That’s the problem, testifies Elizabeth Smola.

“I think wind turbines need to be at least 2.5 kilometers or 1.5 miles away from any permanent residence,” Smola, a Brimfield resident, said.

Speeding up the process, she says, does not begin to address health concerns, including effects, if any, living close to a wind farm could have.

Hers, one of roughly thirty testimonies before the state Legislature’s Joint Committee on Telecom, Utilities and Energy Wednesday at Jiminy Peak.

The panel also heard from supporters who say projects, including Berkshire Wind in Hancock, took longer than necessary thanks to much opposition and legal challenges.

Supporters say the bill would change that by creating scientific standards and streamlining the permitting process.

Local leaders, though, say those standards fall short.

“We at the regional planning commission have been requesting the state work on standards for seven years. They haven’t made any apparent progress, at least they haven’t made any apparent to anybody out here,” said Nathaniel Karns, executive director, Berkshire Regional Planning Commission.

“There’s no real fixed bar that they have to get over,” said Tad Ames, president, Berkshire Natural Resources Council.

“They” being developers. Challengers say their other critique is a contradiction in the bill that opens up a legal loophole, which allows a developer to go forward with a project, even if a town votes against it.

“We would like to see them set standards, at least draft standards before the bill is passed so people can know what the standards will be, if the bill does get passed,” Ames said.

This legislation also has interest out east. A second public hearing will be held on September 26th on Cape Cod.

Source:  By: Brandon Walker, Your News Now, capitalregion.ynn.com 7 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon