LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm problems have not gone away 

Wind farm developers claim any problems from noise flicker and/or shadow (such as those experienced by the residents of Far Old Park, Askam for the last nine years) have been removed through advances in technology.

And yet Viv Paterson’s excellent article highlights that this problem has not gone away.

My heart went out to Ron Williams, 833 metres from Wharrel’s Hill wind farm), who is modern proof that this is still a problem and, despite their platitudes, developers cannot guarantee people won’t suffer.

When will the likes of Jill Perry get it through to their heads that campaigners are not just opposing the harmful effect wind turbines can have in scenic areas, on small businesses and tourism, but the damage caused by the in-appropriate siting of these industrial monsters?

There is evidence of property prices falling and, if that isn’t bad enough, there is the detrimental effect to the quality of life and health.

Until the distance from inhabited dwellings to wind turbines is set at more than one mile (as in the USA) and noise levels (particularly low frequency) are judged in accordance with British Standard 4142, rather than the totally ineffective and unsuitable ETSU-R-97 (which does not even recognise a 21-gun salute fired every 15 minutes as a noise hazard), how can developers get away with breaching the most basic of human rights?

Perhaps Jill Perry or the head of the energy company responsible for Wharrel’s Hill would consider a house-swap with Ron Williams so at least he can start getting a good night’s sleep again?

MRS J FAIRWEATHER

Gilcrux

News & Star

9 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky