| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Mast could lead way for windfarm bid
Credit: Morpeth Herald, www.morpethherald.co.uk 4 August 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A windfarm bid for a site in rural Morpeth could be on its way after an application for a test mast was approved.
But those residents who objected to the plans by TNEI Services Ltd for the 80metre-high structure say they are encouraged that it was approved by Northumberland County Council’s Planning and Environment Committee by only one vote.
The mast will be installed in a field between Molesden and the East and West Edington Farms, which are located off the B6524 Whalton road.
The company says it will collect detailed data to check that the site is suitable to host a windfarm from a wind resource perspective.
There were 74 individual letters of objection and the parish councils of Mitford, Meldon and Whalton were also against the proposal.
At the meeting, Lester Sher spoke on behalf of the Action for Rural Morpeth group.
“Despite the arguments of the developers, at 80 metres high – four times higher than the Angel of the North – this mast has huge impact potential,” he said.
“The proposed site is totally unsuitable for such a development and is rightly zoned purely for agricultural use. Yet a wind mast is industrial.”
Although the committee voted five to four in favour of the planning officers’ recommendation to approve the bid, members reassured the dozens of residents packed into the public gallery that any subsequent application for a windfarm would be an entirely separate issue.
Murray Macrae, Chairman of Action for Rural Morpeth, said: “We were led by council officers to expect that the mast approval was a foregone conclusion based upon planning grounds and precedent.
“The split vote and issues raised by the councillors on the planning committee have greatly encouraged us in our fight against the bigger threat to our heritage, the rural Morpeth landscape and quality of life posed by a future windfarm.
“Our group is certainly not against windfarms per se, but it believes they should be sited in offshore and remote onshore sites that have minimal impact on individual citizens and communities.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=11610 ]
