LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court to hear final appeals in turbine case 

Credit:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer, Springfield News-Sun, www.springfieldnewssun.com 25 July 2011 ~~

URBANA – In September, Ohio’s highest court will host oral arguments concerning a plan to build more than 50 wind turbines in Champaign County.

Champaign County prosecutors, as well as a local citizens group opposed to the Buckeye Wind project, filed appeals with the Ohio Supreme Court last year highlighting their concerns with the project.

The court is scheduled to hear arguments from attorneys on both sides of the case on Wednesday, Sept. 21. Along with the legal arguments that have been filed with the court, each side will have 15 minutes to make their case.

The Buckeye Wind Project, which was approved by the Ohio Power Siting Board last year, would allow Everpower Wind Holdings, based in New York, to construct 53 wind turbines throughout Champaign County.

County officials have said their neither approve nor oppose the project. But prosecutors raised concerns that the OPSB made a mistake in allowing Buckeye Wind to determine the amount of financial assurance necessary to pay for road and bridge repair before construction without first getting the approval of the Champaign County engineer.

Union Neighbors United, a citizens group opposed to the project, also filed a separate appeal arguing that among other issues, the OPSB failed to establish clear noise standards for the project.

Jack Van Kley, an attorney representing UNU, said the supreme court could approve the plan as is, or it could order the OPSB to review and make changes to the project.

Representatives from the Buckeye Wind Project could not be reached for comment Monday.

Source:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer, Springfield News-Sun, www.springfieldnewssun.com 25 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky