LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court rejects wind farm protest 

Controversial plans for a wind farm near Rye were give the green light by a top judge this week.

The scheme for 26 giant turbines at Little Cheyne Court was approved by Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Alistair Darling, last October.

But it came under attack by leading environmentalist Philip Merricks who fears local birds, in particular Bewick Swans, could be caught and killed by the turbines’ flashing blades.

His campaign to halt the project hit the buffers at London’s High Court when a top judge said Mr Darling had fully taken account the alleged threat to birdlife and his decision to approve the wind farm plans could not be faulted.

Icklesham farmer Mr Merricks manages the Romney Marsh Nature Reserve, including the Cheyne Court Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), and was awarded an MBE in 1999 for his services to nature conservation.

Dismissing Mr Merricks’ challenge, Judge Hamilton said a DTI inspector who considered the proposals had correctly applied EU habitat regulations and taken a ‘precautionary approach’ when assessing the risk to bird life.

Mr Merricks argued surveys of the numbers of Bewick swans in the area were deeply flawed as particularly intensive bird scaring activities were going on at the time.

He also said a radar survey should have been carried out to assess the numbers of the protected birds flying over the wind farm site at night.

ryeandbattletoday.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky