LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine plans impact airport 

Credit:  Torstar News Service www.simcoe.com 11 July 2011 ~~

CLEARVIEW TOWNSHIP – A proposed array of giant wind turbines could crimp plans for Collingwood Regional Airport to build its business, says an airport official.

The developer of the wind farm says the turbines – the closest of which would be 3 kilometres from the airport – pose no threat to airport operations, according to an expert consultant.

But Charlie Tatham, who heads the services board that operates the airport for the town, says the technical arguments of experts only go so far.

“The less technical concern is: it’s just plain loony,” Tatham said in an interview about the proposed turbines.

“What would possess them to stick them within a couple of kilometres of a busy airport runway?”

“It’s embarrassing in some respects to have to explain why it’s dumb to put 500-foot towers close to a busy airport. It’s just dumb. ”

Tatham and several local politicians have scheduled a news conference for Wednesday to air their concerns.

The wind farm at the root of the issue has been proposed by wpd Canada Corporation of Mississauga.

The company wants to erect eight turbines just west of the village of Stayner, the closest about 3 kilometres south of Collingwood airport. The blades would reach 150 metres (492 feet) above ground level.

The wind development, if it goes ahead, won’t shut down the airport, Tatham acknowledges.

But it will require some modifications in flight paths in and out.

In addition, a consultant’s report commissioned by the airport says:

“There is significant concern that the turbines are very close to the normal departure zone, and could cause a safety hazard to departing aircraft in marginal visibility conditions.”

The airport has been trying to boost its attractiveness to corporate and business aircraft, especially with the impending closure of Buttonville airport, says Tatham. Buttonville was sold to a developer last year; it is slated to close within five years.

Traffic at Collingwood airport has been growing at 10 to 15 per cent a year for the past several years, he says.

The airport has also spent $100,000 on new equipment making it easier for aircraft to make instrument approaches. The turbines, he says, will protrude into these approach areas, forcing the aircraft into higher flight paths.

It makes the airport less attractive, he says: “Looking at it as a common sense, what on earth would you do this for?”

Kevin Surette, a spokesman for wpd, says his firm hasn’t been given the consultant’s report commissioned by the airport.

But he says his firm has carefully studied the area for several years.

“Safety has always been our Number One concern,” says Surette.

The company hired its own consultant, he said:

“His report has said there are no safety issues to be concerned of.”

Surette says the site was chosen after the company studied wind maps to choose promising locations, then measured wind characteristics in promising areas and found local landowners who were willing to lease their property for turbines.

He said wpd will make a careful study of the report prepared by the airport’s consultant, once it is provided to the company.

If the company gets clearance from provincial authorities to move ahead with the project, the turbines could be up and running by the spring of 2013, Surette said.

Source:  Torstar News Service www.simcoe.com 11 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon