LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm plan decision 

Midlothian Council’s planning committee has thrown out the E.ON application to erect 18 wind turbines at Auchencorth Moss, near Penicuik.

At a meeting on Tuesday February 12, development control manager Peter Arnsdorf outlined the reasons why officials were recommending the proposals be rejected.

It was considered that harm to the area outweighed any benefits.

These included:

The effect on local birdlife;

Potential problems concerning peat bogs and sinking;

The visual impact and its possible deterrent to tourism.

It was noted the applicants had not provided an assessment of potential damage to fisheries or of any flood risk.

They had also been unclear on the proximity of the turbines to the road and had suggested that the final choice of turbine and their locations may differ from those presently proposed.

Alternative

Only three councillors – Alex Bennett, Wilma Chalmers and Margot Russell – came out in favour of the windfarm, while 11 voted against the application.

Councillor Bennett said that as Midlothian Council was not in favour of nuclear power it ought to actively accept wind power as an alternative, thus setting an example.

Three committee members had to leave the chamber, after declaring an interest, on legal advice.

These included chairman Russell Imrie, Owen Thompson and Jim Muirhead, who are on the board of the Pentlands Park Regional Committee (PPRC).

By Tracey Murray
Reporter

Midlothian Advertiser

12 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky