LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Gunn’s Hill gets FIT contract 

Credit:  By Hugo Rodrigues, Sentinel-Review, www.woodstocksentinelreview.com 4 July 2011 ~~

NORWICH – Prowind Canada Inc. has been offered a Feed-in Tariff (FIT) contract for its proposed 10-turbine wind farm on Gunn’s Hill Road in Norwich Township.

The wind energy company received the offer Monday as part of a group of 25 projects given FIT contracts that will tie into the transmission line running from the Bruce nuclear power plant to Milton. The transmission line upgrades will provide the grid capacity needed to take the electricity the project’s 10 turbines would generate. The line upgrades should be complete by the end of 2012.

Prowind’s Juan Anderson said the FIT contract would be a significant boost to helping the Gunn’s Hill project reach reality. With the contract offer, Prowind is now moving to schedule at least one more public-consultation meeting as required under the provincial approval process.

The Gunn’s Hill Road project has been in stasis awaiting a FIT contract, as Prowind didn’t want to submit its renewable energy approval application until it was sure it would get a contract from the Ontario Power Authority.

“This puts us in a position to continue with our application,” Anderson said. “Our revised project documents weren’t released because we’ve been awaiting a FIT contract.”

Anderson said those documents would be released prior to the consultation meeting, after which a so-called consolidation report would be written and the formal renewable energy approval documents submitted to the province. He said the company is now proposing to use a newer-generation of the turbines it had wanted to use, which he said are quieter and produce more electricity.

The 10 turbines would also tie into the grid at a different location, as the company is now proposing to tie into a higher-voltage line that runs west of Woodstock.

There has been strong local opposition to this project from neighbouring property owners, concerned the health impacts of these wind turbines on humans and livestock have not been adequately studied.

They have turned to the Township of Norwich for support on these concerns, and council has been an ally in their attempts to push for these studies and this information to be available. As municipalities are limited to commenting as part of the provincial renewable energy project approval process, Norwich Mayor Donald Doan said there was little more the township could do to help block the project.

One particular concern is the distance between turbines and the nearest homes and livestock barns and pastures. In current regulations, a turbine need only be 500 metres away from the nearest residence, which opponents contest is too close.

“We’re trying to make sure accurate information is available to everyone,” Doan said Monday afternoon. “Council’s – and my – concern is over the setbacks. Are they proper setbacks? Looking at the numbers being used in Europe and the United States, they’ve moved beyond these setbacks.

“Why aren’t we using their most up-to-date information? Why not use their current (setback) figures? It doesn’t make sense.”

The Prowind offer is the largest FIT contract to be awarded to date in Oxford. The first significant one was a 10-megawatt solar farm between Ingersoll and Beachville awarded over a year ago.

Source:  By Hugo Rodrigues, Sentinel-Review, www.woodstocksentinelreview.com 4 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky