| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Windfarm drop off hits Windflow
Credit: TAMLYN STEWART, BusinessDay.co.nz, www.stuff.co.nz 5 July 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Windflow Technology says the wind turbine market in New Zealand has ”stalled” due to lower electricity demand.
Wind farm activity overall is ”stagnant” and decreasing with several very large farms still in the consenting process, while those that had been consented were not being built due to reduced electricity demand, chief executive Geoff Henderson said in a company newsletter today.
The UK market had also failed to deliver the orders Windflow’s UK distributor had expected as high demand for planning consents and electrical connections had slowed down the process and the UK Feed In Tariff review announced in February had caused ”considerable uncertainty” and the turbine market had become more competitive, Henderson said.
”The consequent immediate gap in our sales and production pipeline has resulted in staff cutbacks and a fundamental uncertainty which the directors signalled in early June,” he said.
On June 3 the company announced it was laying off 12 staff from its assembly and procurement teams, realising certain assets and seeking extra capital.
Henderson said today the company was looking to license its core technologies, IP and design, which would mean that manufacturing of the Windflow turbines, at least for some markets, would move predominantly outside of New Zealand.
”While not necessarily the best economic option for New Zealand as jobs would disappear offshore, it will likely be one of the best ways to realise shareholder value going forward.”
The company was still working towards securing orders in New Zealand in the mid term.
Discussions with major shareholder Mighty River Power were still on the go regarding options to proceed with the consented Long Gully site for 25 Windflow turbines.
The Mt Cass wind farm, which potentially could use 70 Windflow turbines, has an environment court hearing at the end of June in Christchurch but as the outcomes of these projects were beyond the company’s control Windflow was looking at opportunities in other markets in the meantime.
The company now needed to raise more capital to continue with its plans and its directors would make an announcement ”shortly”.
”Licensing enables us to more easily penetrate the more hospitable US economy and to leverage the strengths of the IP without carrying cost and complexity,” Henderson said.
It was an ”exciting” manoeuvre, he said.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=10590 ]
