| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Viking wins concrete plant appeals, accusing SIC of ‘serious error’
Credit: Andrew Hirst | The Shetland Times | www.shetlandtimes.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Two large concrete batching plants associated with the Viking Energy windfarm have been given the go ahead, despite councillors’ previous refusal.
The Scottish government this week approved two appeals from Viking developer SSE, overruling the SIC’s decisions from last year.
SSE claimed the council’s planning committee had shown a “fundamental misapprehension” of its role.
Viking had initially been given permission to build three batching plants as part of the overall windfarm consent in 2019.
However it applied to move two of the plants closer to the centre of the site in October 2020, claiming it would result in construction “efficiency gains”.
The revised locations were on two steep hilltops – one 3.2km northeast of Sandwater loch, the other 1.8km northwest of the Upper Kergord section of the B9075.
The batching plants would each be built on 8,000 square metre stone platforms.
The SIC’s planning department considered the proposals “acceptable” and recommended approval.
However, it had also noted objections. Tingwall, Whiteness and Weisdale Community Council raised concerns about noise and suggested one central batching plant would be less environmentally damaging.
Sustainable Shetland described it as “yet another add-on planning application” associated with the windfarm, suggesting the original plans were “not properly thought through”.
Other objections included on the loss of peat habitats, disturbance to breeding birds and the potential for dust to be blown over the surrounding landscape.
The application went before last September’s planning committee, where members went against officers’ recommendations and refused the application.
The committee found that objectors had raised “valid concerns” about the environmental impact and community disturbance. It said there was now a greater understanding of the importance of peatlands, which the refusal would protect.
SSE appealed both refusals in December, It said the planning authority “consistently failed” to give any weight to the views of consultees in making its determination. Had it done so, SSE claimed the committee ought to have granted permission.
It said committee members had “fallen into serious error”.
The Scottish government’s appeal decision found the batching plants were “integral” to the windfarm and there were “no material considerations which would justify refusing to grant planning permission”.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=103396 ]
