| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Local officials issue joint statement on wind project
Credit: Alexa Scherzinger | The Advertiser-Tribune | June 24, 2021 | advertiser-tribune.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
COLUMBUS – State Senator Bill Reineke and State Representatives Riordan McClain and Gary Click issued a joint statement on the Ohio Power Siting Board’s denial of the Republic Wind project that had been proposed for Seneca and Sandusky counties.
The statement came just over an hour after the OPSB meeting adjourned. All three officials supported the board’s decision to deny Republic Wind LLC’s project proposal, and they listed three reasons why.
The first was economic impact – though the officials acknowledged the potential financial benefits that could come from the project, they noted that the benefits would not upset the losses in regards to lowered real estate values, further detracted economic development, restriction of local airspace and “other economic development considerations,” the statement reads.
The second issue brought up in the statement was the environmental impact the project would’ve had. The region selected as the project’s site was full of karst – land made up of soluble rock types important for undergrounds water drainage, and incapable of supporting heavy structures.
Other environmental concerns raised by citizens included noise and visual complaints, avian casualties and loss of farmland.
The third reason listed was public interest. In the OPSB meeting, chair Jenifer French also mentioned this, saying that the project “overall does not serve in the public interest.”
“In finding that the wind project does not serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity, the OPSB has validated all those concerns raised by the endless number of citizens of Seneca County over the last number of years,” read the statement issued by the representatives.
“We commend the citizens of Seneca County, who have steadfastly defended their quality of life and their intuitive protection of their community,” the letter continued. “[They] have rightly argued that they themselves know what is best for their community, not outsiders who never intended to live within the community. We stand proudly with all of them today and continue to be humbled to serve as their elected representatives.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=101106 ]
| Tag: Victories |
