LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lawsuit seeks KOMA compliance, other action from county commission 

Credit:  www.parsonssun.com ~~

Five Southeast Kansas residents have filed a civil suit against the Labette County Commission and Commissioner Brian Kinzie individually relating to Kansas Open Meetings Act compliance and other issues.

The five, Kasey Wilson, Lindsey Wilson, Wayne Bozman, Carmaletta Bozman and Trace Goodwin, are seeking an injunction to prohibit county commissioners from communicating with one another other than in an open meeting. The Kansas Attorney General’s Office investigated KOMA violations and found that an April 27 phone call between Kinzie and Commissioner Cole Proehl violated KOMA. Commissioner Lonie Addis also called the other two commissioners, though his calls were not part of the complaint filed with the attorney general.

The next meeting after that phone call, Proehl introduced and Kinzie approved a resolution relating to negotiating points with a German utility company, RWE Renewables, that wants to develop a wind farm in the western half of Labette County. Proehl and Kinzie said they did not discuss the resolution, but Kinzie said they did talk in general terms about setbacks.

Because of the KOMA violation, the attorney general requires the commissioners to undergo an hour of KOMA training, which they will do Monday morning.

The lawsuit is also seeking to compel commissioners to announce in advance of public meetings all topics of discussion and resolutions to be introduced. If a resolution will be introduced, the suit wants that released to the public in advance of the meeting. The Kansas Open Records Act determines what records are open and closed in Kansas. As KORA relates to this request, a record is generally open once it’s distributed to members of a public board in an open meeting.

The suit also wants to keep commissioners from entering into any agreements with RWE without a unanimous vote of the board. Addis is opposed to the wind development. Proehl and Kinzie said they want to study the issue and determine its benefit to the entire county before deciding if they support the development. They also want to hear from RWE on what it can offer the county.

The lawsuit also seeks to stop Kinzie from interfering with a recall effort underway against him. The suit alleges he spread false claims about the limitations on who can validly sign the recall petition. Kinzie previously said that only people who voted for him could sign the recall petition.

Kansas law allows any registered 2nd District voter to sign the petition if they choose. The recall committee has to collect at least 1,202 valid signatures by Sept. 1. This number represents 40% of the people who voted for Kinzie at the 2020 general election.

The commission has a statutory time period to respond to the suit or to ask for an extension to file its answer. Kinzie still has the option to challenge the recall effort in court. He has 30 days from when the petition was filed, which was June 3.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  www.parsonssun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon